|Circumcision is a Hebrew rite.
Circumcision has changed over the years.
Which type of circumcision did you have?
Brit Milah or Periah?
Milah = only the foreskin is snipped. (Circa the time of Abraham until 140 A.D.)
Periah = the entire fold of skin covering the head of the penis (the prepuce) is
amputated. (Circa 140 A.D. until today)
A foreskin in Scripture is just that. It is the skin that hangs beyond, or before the end of the
penis (click here). Whether you are a believer or non-believer, if you or your mate had the
prepuce (the skin covering the glans of your/his penis) removed...
|YOU NEED TO READ THIS PAGE!
David, the son of Jesse, was an Israelite. Everyone knows that Israel practices circumcision because of the
Creator's covenant with Abraham. Here is an artist's interpretation of David as a youth, right before his one sided
battle with the giant Goliath. He is pictured here about to enter battle, with five smooth stones in his rather large right
hand, and his sling held ready over his left shoulder. Michelangelo's David has been both admired and loathed for
hundreds of years. Regardless of whether you consider his sculpture idolatry, a graven image, indecent, irreverent, or
a masterpiece, Michelangelo's David holds a KEY to your re-education. Question...
Why has Michelangelo's David stood there for several centuries with an uncircumcised looking penis? Was his
model uncircumcised? Did Michelangelo not know that Israelites were circumcised at 8 days of age? Was he ignorant
of Hebrew law? Was Michelangelo embarrassed to chisel into stone the bared glans of an adult penis? Was he
appeasing the uncircumcised majority? Please go to this site, the photos linked therein show the long tapered foreskin
of the Greeks. Now contrast those images with David's penis above. So it appears that Michelangelo knew exactly
what he was doing. Michelangelo's David IS circumcised! In the ancient Hebrew method: Brit Milah! Read on...
Michelangelo's David is called "a Renaissance interpretation of a common ancient Greek theme of a standing heroic
nude male" by wikipedia at this link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_(Michelangelo), meaning that 16th century
Latins understood Greek art. Since this has been established, why isn't David depicted as having a long slender
foreskin rather than the blunt appearance of the ancient Hebrew circumcised penis?
If you are not familiar with the correct anatomic terminology for the male sex organ, click here for line drawings
The Hebrew rite of circumcision began with Abraham. This was a covenant agreement, an outward symbol that
the heavenly Father made with Abraham whereby the Creator would know and recognize the seed (descendants) of
Abraham. You can read this account in Genesis 17:1-14. The command later in Scripture is for every male to be
circumcised on the eighth day after his birth, Leviticus 12:1-3, not the day of his birth. This is in the Law (Torah) so
there is no getting around it for an Israelite or believer. If you are a believer, you are Abraham's seed and the covenant
requirement must be met if you are to be an heir according to the promise. That promise is only given to those who
"fit the description" of Abraham's seed, that outward symbol which the Father will look for.
Regardless of what some believe he meant in I Corinthians 7:19 (that "circumcision is nothing"), Paul cannot undo
what the Father commands in the Torah. Paul also wrote:
Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Messiah hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of
Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Messiah shall profit you nothing.
For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law.
Messiah is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.
For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith.
For in Yahushua Messiah neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by
love. Galatians 5:1-6
So which is it? Paul or the Heavenly Father? Who are you more concerned about? Would you rather fear Paul
and his promise of rejection for being circumcised or would you dare disobey the Mighty One of Israel and not be
circumcised? Please remember, no one can undo the words of a previous prophet. Only the heavenly Father Himself
can change His requirements, and He never changes (Malachi 3:6), what He says stands forever (Ecclesiastes 3:14,
Isaiah 40:8). There was and is nothing wrong with the Law of Yah. This is what the naked guy depicted above had to
say about it....
The law (Torah) of YHVH is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of YHVH is sure, making wise the simple.
The statutes of YHVH are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of YHWH is pure, enlightening the eyes.
The fear of YHVH is clean, enduring forever: the judgments of YHVH are true and righteous altogether.
More to be desired are they than gold, yea, than much fine gold: sweeter also than honey and the honeycomb.
Moreover by them is thy servant warned: and in keeping of them there is great reward. Psalm 19:7-11
Speaking for the Deity of Israel, the prophet Isaiah wrote this: To the law (Torah) and to the testimony (of the
prophets): if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them. Isaiah 8:20
Torah, which means "book of instruction", is the first 5 books of Scripture. There are two different words for Law
and Commandment in Scripture. They are not one and the same. In Deuteronomy 4:2 we are commanded not to add
or diminish aught (anything) from the law (Torah). If anyone, you, me, Paul or even Messiah himself, thinks to
change the law, that person is a false teacher, a false apostle or false prophet. In fact, we are told to live by EVERY
word that proceeds from the mouth of Yah (Deuteronomy 8:3, Matthew 4:4). No prophet or apostle can undo what a
previous prophet (or apostle) has been instructed by Yah to write or say. Please read the account in I Kings 13 if you
doubt the soundness of the above statement. The most damning evidence against Paul's "theology" is found in the Old
Testament. The prophet Ezekiel, speaking for Yah Himself, said the following.
And YHVH said unto me, Son of man, mark well, and behold with thine eyes, and hear with thine ears all that I say
unto thee concerning all the ordinances of the house of YHVH, and all the laws thereof; and mark well the entering
in of the house, with every going forth of the sanctuary.
And thou shalt say to the rebellious, even to the house of Israel, Thus saith the Sovereingn YHVH; O ye house of
Israel, let it suffice you of all your abominations,
In that ye have brought into My sanctuary strangers, uncircumcised in heart, and uncircumcised in flesh, to be in
My sanctuary, to pollute it, even My house, when ye offer My bread, the fat and the blood, and they have broken My
covenant because of all your abominations.
And ye have not kept the charge of Mine holy things: but ye have set keepers of My charge in My sanctuary for
Thus saith the Sovereign YHVH; No stranger, uncircumcised in heart, nor uncircumcised in flesh, shall enter into
My sanctuary, of any stranger that is among the children of Israel. Ezekiel 44:5-9
Not only is there a positive command for the seed of Abraham to circumcise in Scripture, there is the promise of
REJECTION by the Father if you are NOT circumcised in the heart AND flesh. Paul made a VERY brash and foolish
statement in Galatians 5. If an uncircumcised stranger pollutes the sanctuary of YHVH, what standard do you think
YHVH upholds for an Israelite, a person who should have read and understood the instructions of Yah? There is a
command to circumcise in Scripture that no believing male can get around (unless you fear Paul over Yah). However,
there is an "alternative" that you are probably not aware of, namely the type of circumcision that was actually
commanded in the first place.
Abraham was commanded to circumcise (Hebrew word Moolaw or Milah) himself and his son Ishmael and all his
male servants. You can look this work up on Strong's Concordance. The type of circumcision practiced today in the
good ol' US of A and elsewhere is the Hebrew word Periah. There is a VAST difference between Milah and Periah.
Milah required only the tip of the foreskin to be removed (photo), not the entire fold of skin covering the glans
penis (head of the penis). With the covenant circumcision, on the 8th day after birth a strap of leather with a hole in it
was placed before the infant's penis, and the foreskin (skin at the fore end of the penis) was pulled through the leather
strap until the strap rested against the tip of the glans penis (head). Only what protruded through the leather strap was
snipped off. If an infant did not have enough skin to actually protrude through the leather strap, the skin that was there
was poked with a sharp object just enough to draw blood, thus the covenant agreement was observed.
Periah is a whole other ballgame, only it's no game. As already mentioned, Periah is the removal of the skin
covering the entire glans (head) of the penis. This skin is called the prepuce. How did this diabolical scheme come
about? A little less than 2,000 years ago, the Hebrews/Israelites had assimilated themselves into all walks of life in the
Roman empire, which was still very much a Hellenistic (Greek) culture and society. Hebrew men used the public bath
houses and even competed in the Olympics. Obviously, you are nude in a bath house, likewise the ancient Olympics
were competed in the buff. N-A-K-E-D. Women were not allowed to compete and were not allowed as spectators.
Men only. My how times have changed.
Well, the Greeks considered circumcision to be repugnant. The bared glans was offensive to them. So, in order
to be "more acceptable" some Israelite men began to tug their foreskin down to better or more completely cover the
glans of their penis. You've all seen photos of some tribes in Africa, South America and the Pacific islands where their
lips and/or earlobes are stretched to unimaginable proportions. It is a medically proven fact that when put under
constant tension, stretched skin will grow more skin. Remember, Milah circumcision only removed a snip off the tip
as an infant which left a considerable amount of skin covering the glans of a Hebrew man's flaccid (not hard) penis.
While the Hebrew penis did not look exactly like that of Greek (Gentile) men, the glans (head of his penis) was in
varying degrees still covered by a fold of skin, the prepuce. Tugging grows skin.
This the Rabbis could not tolerate. So about 140 A.D., they invented a different form of circumcision that no
Israelite or Jew (there is a difference) would be able to hide. PERIAH!! The Father does not ask for all your increase,
only 10% as a tithe, nor did He ask for you to keep every day holy, only the seventh day. Likewise, He did not ask
for the entire covering of the glans of your (or your mate's) penis only the "fore" skin (that hangs before the "penis").
You were not born with anything that you do not need. This Periah circumcision is a Rabbinical reform and is
nowhere commanded in Scripture. THIS is why you are missing something you were born with, something that the
heavenly Father Himself did not ask for. You or your parents gave up something and you are missing something
because of a group of Jewish Rabbis. I am not anti-Semitic, I am only stating historical facts. The Scriptures that I
present here were written BY Semites.
What I am is hopping mad. Not at my parents, but at the Rabbis. Periah circumcision is a damned lie, a
counterfeit! You've been robbed! A friend, after reading this website, said it best. "It makes me sick how the enemy
has come to kill, steal and destroy." For my personal testimony on this matter, click here. We have been fed all
manner of lies and have fallen for them, but this is one of the few that actually touches the human body. I was born
with something I was meant to have, that was created JUST for me and my spouse. Through the vain imagination of
carnal men, something has STOLEN something from both the husband AND the wife. A few snips here and a few
chops there and viola, the Rabbis trashed a masterpiece. Only one body part can claim a higher status, and after
creating His greatest masterpiece, the Creator even pats Himself on the back. This is too racy to print here, but you
can read it for yourself in Song of Solomon 7:1. There is only one thing found near the "joint of the thigh" that the
Creator (and all manner of men thereafter) might call a masterpiece.
And they that shall be of thee shall build the old waste places: thou shalt raise up the foundations of many
generations; and thou shalt be called, The repairer of the breach, The restorer of paths to dwell in. Isaiah 58:12
This is what one author had to say on this verse... "In the time of the end every divine institution is to be restored."
Prophets and Kings, p. 678
A nearly complete foreskin after Milah circumcision is one of those Divine institutions. I have no idea if this author
was aware of the magnitude of this statement, but I am taking this particular restoration VERY personally, and VERY
If you think I am making any of this up, check me out:
History of Circumcision
Circumcision: Then and Now
|To learn just exactly WHAT you are missing because of a Periah circumcision, click below. Please be forewarned:
intercourse between a 1. Periah circumcised male and his mate and intercourse between a 2. Milah circumcised,
uncircumcised male (or restored male) and his mate is openly discussed. It is meant for education purposes only, not
for any perverted pleasure. Let's be mature adults here. Anatomically correct terminology is used. Click here.
|To see how times have REALLY (been) changed, click here. This link will take you to a website dedicated to the
restoration of the Calendar that the heavenly Father established in the Garden of Eden.
Nearly everything you have been taught about "time" is a counterfeit.